CT Budget Writers Struggle to Fund School Aid

Connecticut lawmakers face a tight deadline to fund $270M in school and municipal aid, but spending cap rules and slow revenue growth complicate the effort.

· · 4 min read

Connecticut’s budget writers face a knotty problem heading into the final stretch of the legislative session: how to send hundreds of millions more dollars to struggling school districts when the state’s fiscal rules say there’s no money to spare.

Gov. Ned Lamont and Democratic legislative leaders have largely agreed on what they want. More municipal aid, with roughly $170 million in extra education grants and another $100 million in non-education funding flowing to towns next fiscal year. A serious new investment in affordable child care. Help keeping Connecticut hospitals financially stable. Simple enough on paper. Not so simple to pay for.

The General Assembly adjourns May 6. That’s the deadline, and it’s close.

The spending cap problem

Here’s the core tension. There’s no room for any of that new spending under the state’s spending cap, which limits how fast the budget can grow by tying it to household income growth. Lamont can legally blow past the cap, but only if he declares a fiscal emergency and gets 60% of both the House and Senate to go along. That’s a high bar, politically and practically.

Even clearing the cap doesn’t solve the money problem. Connecticut’s general revenues aren’t growing fast enough to cover the new commitments. The state corporate tax, which Connecticut ties to the federal code as many states do, has come in roughly $350 million below projections after Congress and President Donald Trump extended federal corporate tax breaks last July that had been scheduled to expire. That’s a serious hit.

So where does the money come from?

The volatility cap and the savings cushion

There’s a large pot of money sitting just outside the regular budget. Connecticut runs a special savings program that captures a portion of volatile income and business tax receipts, keeping them out of reach of annual appropriations. This fiscal year, that program has stockpiled $1.8 billion, and nonpartisan analysts said Friday it will likely surpass $1.9 billion before June 30.

The program has been central to Connecticut’s fiscal turnaround since 2020, when the state started attacking its massive pension debt with unusual aggression. Tapping those reserves to pay for annual school aid would, by definition, slow that paydown. That’s the trade-off lawmakers are staring at.

Lamont has been careful here. “I want to make sure I keep my commitment to my towns and cities, because they’re having a hard time with education, and make sure it’s within the confines of an honestly balanced budget,” he said last week. That phrasing, “honestly balanced,” signals he’s not willing to paper over a structural gap with accounting moves.

Why towns are desperate right now

School districts across Connecticut spent years relying on temporary federal pandemic relief, money that started flowing in 2021 and is now gone. Districts used it to hire staff, expand programs, and cover costs that their regular budgets couldn’t absorb. Now those costs remain but the federal dollars don’t.

Rising health care and energy costs are compounding the squeeze. Legislators from both parties say districts are being pushed to the limit. That’s not a partisan talking point; it’s what town finance directors have been telling Hartford for months. The pressure is particularly acute in mid-sized cities like New Haven, Bridgeport, and Hartford, where the Education Cost Sharing formula is supposed to compensate for local property tax limitations but has never fully delivered on that promise.

For Gold Coast towns, the calculus is different but still real. Greenwich and Darien fund their schools mostly through local property taxes and feel less direct pain from state grant cuts. But their residents still pay state income taxes, and how Connecticut manages its pension obligations will directly affect long-term fiscal stability, which flows through to municipal credit ratings and eventually to property values.

Lamont’s tax rebate is the likely casualty

The $200-per-person tax rebate Lamont proposed earlier this year looks like it won’t survive the budget negotiation. That’s not a huge loss for most Connecticut Navigator readers; $200 is a rounding error for a household earning $200,000. But it was a political signal, and dropping it means Lamont takes a small hit.

The CT Mirror has been tracking these negotiations closely, and the picture that emerges is of a majority that agrees on goals but hasn’t solved the math.

Watch the next two weeks carefully. If Lamont declares a fiscal emergency before May 6, that’s the signal a deal is close. If he doesn’t, the session ends without a finished budget, and everything gets messier from there.

Written by

Connecticut Navigator Staff

Editorial Staff