CT Child Tax Credit Push Gains Legislative Momentum

Connecticut advocates say they have the votes to pass a child tax credit bill, but still face uncertainty over whether Gov. Ned Lamont will sign it.

· · 3 min read
Image related to CT Child Tax Credit Push Gains Legislative Momentu

Advocates pushing for a Connecticut child tax credit say they already have the legislative votes to get a bill to Gov. Ned Lamont’s desk, and they’re moving fast to make it happen before the current session closes.

The push comes as Connecticut families continue to feel the squeeze of elevated costs on groceries, housing, and child care. Supporters argue a state-level credit would put real money back in the pockets of working parents, particularly those in lower and middle income brackets who can least absorb those pressures.

The proposal has picked up significant momentum at the Capitol, with a growing coalition of lawmakers signing on. Getting enough names on a co-sponsorship list is one thing. Converting that support into a floor vote, and then getting the governor’s signature, is another challenge entirely.

Lamont has historically been cautious about new recurring tax expenditures, preferring targeted, time-limited relief over permanent structural changes to the tax code. His office has not committed to signing a child tax credit bill, which means advocates know they need to build enough political pressure to make a veto politically costly.

Connecticut already offers a modest property tax credit and has expanded its earned income tax credit in recent years. But a dedicated child tax credit would be a different kind of commitment, one tied specifically to the number of children in a household and designed to phase in or phase out based on income. The specifics of the current proposal, including the per-child amount and income thresholds, will determine how many families actually benefit and how much the credit costs the state.

That cost question will be central to any serious debate. Connecticut is in a structurally better fiscal position than it was five years ago, partly due to volatile capital gains tax revenues that have been deposited into its rainy day fund rather than spent. But budget analysts have flagged that revenue picture as fragile. A sustained market downturn would hit Connecticut’s income tax collections hard, and locking in a new credit creates an obligation that doesn’t disappear when hedge fund bonuses dry up.

Fairfield County’s economy makes this point sharper than most. A large chunk of Connecticut’s income tax revenue flows from a relatively small number of very high earners concentrated in Greenwich, Westport, and Darien. When that cohort has a bad year, the state budget feels it immediately. Advocates for the credit would argue that’s exactly why a child tax credit matters: lower and middle income families need a buffer that doesn’t depend on what happens in financial markets.

The federal child tax credit expansion that passed in 2021 under the American Rescue Plan briefly cut child poverty rates in Connecticut and nationally by a measurable degree before it expired. That experience gave credit advocates concrete data to point to, and they’ve used it effectively. The argument isn’t theoretical anymore. Expanded credits moved the needle on poverty numbers, at least temporarily, and supporters want Connecticut to build a permanent version of that result at the state level.

The political math in Hartford looks favorable for now. Democrats control both chambers, and the progressive wing of the caucus has made the credit a priority. The question is whether leadership moves the bill aggressively or lets it stall in the budget negotiation shuffle, where competing priorities tend to absorb political energy.

Business groups have been largely quiet on the issue so far. A child tax credit doesn’t directly affect corporate tax burdens, so the typical opposition machinery hasn’t engaged the way it might on a capital gains tax proposal. That relative silence could benefit advocates trying to build momentum.

Lamont has until the end of the session to signal where he stands. If he comes out clearly in favor, the bill likely moves quickly. If he continues to hedge, supporters will need to decide whether to push for a vote anyway and force a political confrontation, or negotiate down to a smaller credit they’re confident he’ll sign.

Connecticut families watching this debate want a straightforward answer: will the state help offset the cost of raising kids or not. The next few weeks will determine whether this year is when lawmakers finally deliver one.

Written by

David Rizzo

Staff Writer